Laura Callaghan

On my brief experience working in the music industry…

Or “…my brief experience working in the music industry and why I hated it.”

My experience working in the music industry is peripheral, but it’s an entity that I wish to not come any closer to.

Just to give some background and context, within the past year I’ve turned into radio DJ, turned music blogger, turned club promotor, turned DJ.  And in all those rapidly escalating minor career changes, none of what was being bestowed on me was ever what I had initially intended on doing or even asking for.

Being a girl in the electronic music industry is looked upon as being a sort of rare and unseen gem in a gigantic sausage-fest of DJs and producers.

“Wow!! Is that a girl?”

Why are girls treated like spotting a mythical creature in the realm of club/trap culture and electronic music?

Where are all the girls?

Where are all the girl DJs? The girl producers?

Yes, they’re here, and they obviously do exist.

But I think the bigger question begs something more of the entire community; why aren’t girls welcome?

Well, now you’ve come to the right place.

Because I’m here to tell you exactly why I did not enjoy my brief experience in the music industry, in fact, I downright hated it.

Never have I ever felt so belittled and taken advantage of in a quote-on-quote “workplace”.  I’ve been very steamed about my experience for long enough, but I never had the real time and energy to begin to methodically explain how sexist this industry is.

For starters, the idea that a woman can have interest in a genre of music that is deemed to be “masculine” or, in other words, “not popular among women” (aka not T-Swift), is something men believe to be some kind of a “girl’s boy” quality.  And let the fetishism then commence for those females who have a markedly “unique” or “good” taste in music, because there is very heavy sexualization going on for all the women who are DJ’s and producers.

Not to mention, all of my unpaid work experiences of being hired to simply act as a pretty and ethnic centerpiece, my ideas and the ideas of women who were my peers, were never taken into any serious consideration.

It’s hard to find any articles written by women who are in the electronic music industry that discuss anything about their own personal experiences. Regardless of a few notable tweets by some outspoken female DJs and producers, no think-pieces are being launched on their behalf, and all of the music journalists lack the freedom to publish any editorials on the subject.

As noted by previous articles, women are given much less attention than male artists.  Male artists are consistently promoted, and written about more than female artists.

The path to success for women is not made any easier when it is constantly being undermined by men that have the audacity to use female aliases to be “edgy” or “unique.”

SOPHIE – Producer (UK)

Would naming yourself after a common female name still be a trend for men if there were as many female artists known in that community?  The act of using a female alias greatly weakens the authority that women hold in that genre, while also points directly to the privilege that men possess.

Women in this field constantly live under the fist of the omnipresent patriarchy; because they all live in the fear of what would possibly happen if they spoke ill of all their male counterparts for their problematic behavior.  Being slave to the overwhelmingly male-dominated field, women really aren’t given much of the spotlight and no room to share any of their opinions.

There lacks any safe-spaces for females.  As a result, so many of these women involved in this genre of music glaze over problematic behavior and sexist practices just to fit into the trend and climb the ladder to success.

What’s even more messed up is that there’s a lot of men out there who do try to take advantage of these *special* women (and believe you me, I’ve lost many-a-“friend” for saying no). The concept of “sleeping your way to the top” is very real and it is still very alive and well in the minds of these men.

What’s scary is how far the patriarchy has really penetrated into this field.

And no, I will not just sit back and accept that this is the way the entertainment industries work.

Take this as my letter of resignation, but I do not wish to contribute to working in such a toxic environment.

The fast-track to success is never long and lasting.


featured image by Laura Callaghan

Liliane Yidan

Can women ever be recognized as auteurs?

On my daily aimless perusing of IMDb I stumble upon article and article about all the celebrated directors of our time, and user compiled lists of “greatest directors ever.”  One thing I found that all these lists tend to have in common is that all of these “legendary” directors are men.  And not to mention when you google the terms “greatest directors” you’re immediately met with a scrolling banner of only white men.

via twodollarcinema.blogspot.com
from google image search of “greatest directors” via twodollarcinema.blogspot.com

In one of my film courses we were asked if we could name a female director and only about two or three students in my class of thirty could utter a name.

I’m not sure if this problem is seemingly glaring to anyone outside of the entertainment industry, since the audience only extends itself as far as viewing the final product.  But that still does not lessen the severity of this issue of inequality.  And to say that this is only an issue of the entertainment industry is looking at only a fraction of the entire problem.

The history of film is being taught to celebrate only these specific figures, without any room or consideration of greatness for someone else (namely a woman).

Women have been making movies for just as long as men have been, but that fact goes buried beneath the repeated and tired sentiments of praise for the same male directors.  The lack of discussion of women directors only continues to solidify a stigma against women being directors.

The assumption that women haven’t been directing movies just gives an underlying impression of amateurism and displacement in their work.

If a woman’s place isn’t in the director’s seat, then it must be a man’s.

Much like the rest of our textbooks, a missed opportunity for female recognition always seems to be a symptom of our society’s study of history and art.

And if women aren’t immediately recognized as directors, how can women ever be recognized as auteurs?

There are many barriers for women to be successfully recognized and celebrated as being innovative in creating films without being discredited and even labeled as an amateur filmmaker just because they aren’t male.  And let’s face it, it’s only because women as a whole gender have never had any experience professionally directing and even if they did those films would only be “chick movies”! (cue eye-roll).

To be plain, without any hinge of satire, I’m so tired of only celebrating white male directors as geniuses and auteurs.

Sure, their work is innovative and different, but can we take the same amount of time to appreciate female (as well as people of color) directors just as much?


Featured image: Sofia Coppola by Liliane Yidan

Peyton Fulford

On the subject of the female body and lipstick feminism.

In my sophomore year of college I took a course called “The Philosophy of Feminism.”  Many or perhaps nearly all of the texts we read had been written by baby-boom era liberal white feminist philosophers.  I have no inherent problems or objections with reading these texts, however my only argument against this method of teaching is the lack of diversity in both the authors and their ideas.

Many of the ideas we had read by these thinkers preached their notions and opinions of modesty vs. immodesty.  Modesty being well-clad women vs. the immodest bare-backed ladies in tight clothing.

One of the papers we had to write was to agree or refute with an article called “Modesty as a Feminist Sexual Virtue” by Anne Barnhill.  Barnhill writes that the next step women should take in order to ensure a future that is free of gender inequality, is to behave out of sexual modesty as a feminist virtue.  As defined by Barnhill, sexual modesty does not refer to acting in a “prudish” way, but only displaying sexuality in the appropriate circumstances.

Barnhill illustrates sexually modest feminists as different than the radical feminists and the “lipstick feminists,” both of whom she disapproves of. 

http://fformlessness.tumblr.com/

Wait what? Isn’t lipstick feminism exactly the trend that we’ve been seeing all over social media in the past few years?  

And Anne Barnhill believes that precisely this kind of feminism is what is contributing to the promotion of sexism and not the dissolution of it.

Now there’s something that really caught you…

But aren’t people like say, Beyoncé, trailblazers of this new lipstick-feminist-flawless-lady movement? Sure she is and that’s why Anne Barnhill isn’t a Bey fan.

Barnhill claims that Beyoncé is only a mere sexual figure of modern pop culture because of her use of sexual immodesty in her expressions.  She claims that she is not a figure for any subject that is intellectual, political…etc. but rather just a figure of a purely sexual category.  Therefore the path that Beyoncé is leading women down is a fiery path of self-destruction and sexualization.

Well, that’s a bit extreme and obviously not true.  I accept the fact that Beyoncé, as some might say, dresses the part in a world where sex sells.  But a figure with as much public power as Ms. Knowles possesses today is bringing something different to the table.  And I do not condemn Beyoncé because she’s opening an acceptable discussion on a topic that has been historically ridiculed and shamed in the past.  Beyoncé may be using flashing lights, leotards, and 7-inch heels to get the word of feminism across to millions, but she’s initiating a conversation on something that has been hidden and tarnished from public discussion for years.

And all of the elaborate costumes and methods Ms. Knowles is using as described above is a nightmare to Ms. Barnhill.  Because then the image of feminism will only become associated with the aforementioned dress and attitude that Ms. Knowles and all the lipstick feminists promote. Those young girls being taught to be “flawless,” to wake up in the morning feeling beautiful, and wearing whatever-the-hell they want – those girls are all over tumblr – and it’s become the new wave of feminism circulating all over social media nowadays.

Laura Callaghan

The solution that Barnhill proposes is to therefore advise all women to act in a sexually modest way.  At the same time this advice to cover-up seems analogous to the advice that women are given in order to be safe when walking home at night.  Both include precautionary suggestions to protect women from the harm induced from being sexualized by men.

Cautionary advice given and taught to women, is fueled by the belief that women who are more “sexually appealing” to men have a higher chance of being sexually assaulted or raped.  And those women who are sexually modest propose a higher chance for achieving gender equality since they have less of a chance of being objectified, they will then be taken more seriously.

So here’s my real problem with Anne Barnhill and why I have been thinking of this essay for the past two years:

No one should be telling women they need to cover up and if they don’t, they’re being a bad feminist.

Here’s what the real problem is, it’s not the woman, and it’s not her body, it’s men.

When it comes down to it all, we are all just human beings made up of millions of cells wearing pieces of cloth sewed together.  And every notion of clothing and every view of different body parts is applied and determined culturally.  Yes, that might be a very odd, objective, and anthropological perspective, but bear with me.

Because if we follow the proposed trajectory that Anne Barnhill is suggesting when will the female body be acceptable? If even at all ever?

We should not be telling women to cover up their own bodies for the sake of exposing themselves to being sexualized and not taken seriously.

We should be teaching men not to sexualize the female body.

Women should not be constantly told over time that it is their fault; that their bodies are what is to blame for men not taking them seriously, or being sexualized, and even worse sexually abused.

The problem is men and what society is teaching them. We should not be tip-toeing around the problem anymore at this point in time and saying that yet again it is the woman to blame for her own body.

If the desexualized female body was a cultural norm in our society then this entire thread of conversation would be entirely moot. And if that were the case would Beyoncé still be considered a bad feminist figure?

Because being a “bad feminist” is not being a lipstick feminist.

Being a “bad feminist” is not being a feminist period. And it’s also shaming other women for being themselves when they have their heads in the right ballpark for positive feminist thinking.